{"id":6131,"date":"2016-06-03T21:16:43","date_gmt":"2016-06-03T21:16:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/revistakuvendi.org\/?p=6131"},"modified":"2016-06-03T21:16:43","modified_gmt":"2016-06-03T21:16:43","slug":"vetem-lasgush-poradeci-nuk-e-firmosi-rezoluten-e-kongresit-te-drejtshkrimit","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/revistakuvendi.org\/?p=6131","title":{"rendered":"Vet\u00ebm Lasgush Poradeci nuk e firmosi Rezolut\u00ebn e Kongresit t\u00eb Drejtshkrimit"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"DAVID<\/a>\u00a0Nga Prof.dr. David Luka*<\/strong><\/p>\n

Luka: Gjuha Standarde asht Gjuha e Kostallarit dhe Partise marksiste-leniniste! Asht Gjuhe e Dhunshme!<\/strong><\/p>\n

Shqipja standarde, e ligj\u00ebruar si e till\u00eb n\u00eb koh\u00ebn e regjimit, nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb e dh\u00ebn\u00eb e natyrshme e vet\u00eb gjuh\u00ebs son\u00eb. Gjuh\u00ebtari David Luka, shkruan se ideologjia marksiste ishte ajo q\u00eb \u00e7oi n\u00eb vendosjen e dhunshme t\u00eb k\u00ebtij standardi.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Pyetja: Cila \u00ebsht\u00eb baza dialektore e shqipes standarde?,<\/strong>\u00a0nuk shtrohet kot s\u00eb koti. Tashm\u00eb dihet prej gjithkujt se n\u00eb Kongresin e Drejtshkrimit t\u00eb Gjuh\u00ebs Shqipe, e pas tij, p\u00ebr 20 vjet rresht, \u00ebsht\u00eb th\u00ebn\u00eb e st\u00ebrth\u00ebn\u00eb, p\u00ebrs\u00ebritur e st\u00ebrp\u00ebrs\u00ebritur se \u201cGjuha shqipe \u00ebsht\u00eb sistem sistemesh dhe gjuha letrare komb\u00ebtare \u00ebsht\u00eb sistem mbidialektor\u201d. N\u00eb skem\u00ebn e paraqitur p\u00ebr ta shpjeguar n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb thuk\u00ebt iden\u00eb e dh\u00ebn\u00eb m\u00eb lart, jan\u00eb v\u00ebn\u00eb n\u00eb Legjend\u00eb k\u00ebto shpjegime, q\u00eb nuk l\u00ebn\u00eb asnj\u00eb shteg p\u00ebr diskutim:
\n\u2022\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0Elementet e p\u00ebrbashk\u00ebta t\u00eb dy dialekteve.
\n\u2022\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0Elementet e ve\u00e7anta t\u00eb dialektit t\u00eb Jugut.
\n\u2022\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0Elementet e ve\u00e7anta t\u00eb dialektit t\u00eb Veriut.
\n\u2022\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0Baza e gjuh\u00ebs letrare komb\u00ebtare.
\n\u2022\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0Gjuha letrare komb\u00ebtare.
\n\u2022\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0Gjuha komb\u00ebtare.
\nE k\u00ebto p\u00ebrfundime nuk jan\u00eb nxjerr\u00eb m\u00eb 1972, po 12 vjet m\u00eb von\u00eb, m\u00eb 1984, n\u00eb Konferenc\u00ebn shkencore \u201cGjuha letrare komb\u00ebtare shqipe dhe epoka jon\u00eb\u201d, organizuar nga Akademia e Shkencave e RPS t\u00eb Shqip\u00ebris\u00eb, n\u00eb referatin e ideatorit t\u00eb \u201cshqipes standarde\u201d, prof. Androkli Kostallarit.
\nDeri n\u00eb vitin 1990, tezat (p\u00ebrkat. bazat filozofike) e prof. Kostallarit jan\u00eb mbrojtur me fanatiz\u00ebm nga t\u00eb gjith\u00eb gjuh\u00ebtar\u00ebt titullar\u00eb shqiptar\u00eb (duke p\u00ebrfshir\u00eb k\u00ebtu edhe ata kosovar\u00eb), duke derdhur pa \u201chesap\u201d mendime, q\u00eb n\u00eb asnj\u00eb rast e p\u00ebr asnj\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtje, nuk e kund\u00ebrshtonin teorin\u00eb sui generis, q\u00eb pati shtruar A. Kostallari p\u00ebr rrug\u00ebn e formimit t\u00eb gjuh\u00ebs letrare komb\u00ebtare shqipe. P\u00ebrkundrazi, miratonin pa asnj\u00eb v\u00ebrejtje mendimet e Kostallarit, bile duke i thurur lavde atij.
\nFilozofia dhe praktika e prof. Kostallarit, tashm\u00eb dihet, ishte ajo marksiste-leniniste, e mish\u00ebruar n\u00eb t\u00eb ashtuquajtur\u00ebn \u201cpolitik\u00eb gjuh\u00ebsore t\u00eb partis\u00eb\u201d. Parimi baz\u00eb, n\u00eb at\u00eb koh\u00eb, p\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb problem ka qen\u00eb ky: \u201c\u2026 vet\u00eb gjuha nuk ka karakter klasor, por politika gjuh\u00ebsore ka karakter klasor, n\u00eb t\u00eb pasqyrohet edhe lufta e klasave brenda vendit \u2026\u201d.<\/strong>
\nMe k\u00ebt\u00eb refren ne qem\u00eb m\u00ebsuar aq shum\u00eb, sa e pat\u00ebm besuar apriori. Gjithsesi, nj\u00eb shqipe mbidialektore, do t\u00eb ishte nj\u00eb realizim i p\u00ebrkryer, dhe prof. Kostallari duhej p\u00ebrg\u00ebzuar p\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb. Aq m\u00eb tep\u00ebr, kur edhe ballkanolog\u00eb t\u00eb njohur (si\u00e7 shkruan vet\u00eb Kostallari) kan\u00eb n\u00ebnvizuar ve\u00e7orin\u00eb e shqipes letrare \u201csi model i nj\u00eb gjuhe q\u00eb nuk u krijua ad hoc, por e arriti nj\u00ebsimin n\u00ebp\u00ebrmjet nj\u00eb procesi t\u00eb nd\u00ebrlikuar e t\u00eb gjat\u00eb \u2026\u201d
\nMir\u00ebpo, n\u00eb shkrimin e prof. Kostallarit, t\u00eb p\u00ebrmendur m\u00eb lart, pat\u00ebm m\u00ebsuar se \u201cKa edhe studiues t\u00eb ve\u00e7ant\u00eb \u2026 q\u00eb kan\u00eb mbivler\u00ebsuar elemente t\u00eb ve\u00e7anta q\u00eb dallojn\u00eb dy dialektet e shqipes dhe e kan\u00eb interpretuar n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebanshme shqipen e sotme letrare, t\u00eb nj\u00ebsuar thjesht si nj\u00eb \u2018tosk\u00ebrishte letrare\u2019 t\u00eb ngritur drejtp\u00ebrdrejt n\u00eb gjuh\u00eb letrare komb\u00ebtare \u2026 Nd\u00ebr to bie n\u00eb sy sidomos monografia e Xhenet Bajronit me titull \u2026 N\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb vep\u00ebr, q\u00eb p\u00ebrmban mjaft pohime kund\u00ebrth\u00ebn\u00ebse, formimi i shqipes letrare t\u00eb nj\u00ebsuar trajtohet n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb shtremb\u00ebruar e t\u00eb thjesht\u00ebzuar.\u201d<\/p>\n

N\u00eb sh\u00ebn. nr. 4 Kostallari shton: \u201c\u00cbsht\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u2019u sh\u00ebnuar se n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb vep\u00ebr, nuk shfryt\u00ebzohen fare Aktet e k\u00ebtij Kongresi dhe botimet e r\u00ebnd\u00ebsishme pas tij, pa t\u00eb cilat nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb e mundshme t\u00eb vler\u00ebsohen objektivisht tiparet e shqipes letrare t\u00eb nj\u00ebsuar dhe prirjet e zhvillimit t\u00eb sot\u00ebm\u201d.
\nMegjith\u00ebse vepra e Xh. Bajronit qe botuar m\u00eb 1976, kurrkush prej gjuh\u00ebtar\u00ebve nuk kishte folur a shkruar p\u00ebr t\u00eb, as k\u00ebtu tek ne e as n\u00eb Kosov\u00eb.
\n1.\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0Kostallari m\u00ebton se ka b\u00ebr\u00eb nj\u00eb analiz\u00eb shkencore t\u00eb sistemit t\u00eb gjuh\u00ebs son\u00eb letrare, ku ai mb\u00ebshtet teorin\u00eb e vet. Sipas Kostallarit, gjuha shqipe ka krijuar nj\u00eb sistem t\u00eb vetin, q\u00eb i takon nj\u00eb rrafshi m\u00eb t\u00eb lart\u00eb se ish-variantet letrare e dialektet dhe funksionon si nj\u00eb sistem i pavarur e t\u00ebr\u00ebsor i nj\u00eb tipi t\u00eb ri. Ky sistem nuk p\u00ebrputhet me asnj\u00ebrin prej sistemeve t\u00eb k\u00ebtij apo atij varianti letrar t\u00eb m\u00ebparsh\u00ebm, as nuk p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebson nj\u00eb shkrirje mekanike t\u00eb varianteve letrare, por \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb sintez\u00eb e re organike e elementeve t\u00eb gjuh\u00ebs shqipe, e krijuar historikisht nga zhvillimi i gjuh\u00ebs son\u00eb.
\nNga ky parashtrim i Kostallarit, nxirren dy p\u00ebrfundime: S\u00eb pari, zhvillimi i gjuh\u00ebs shqipe \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb proces dialektik (k\u00ebtu n\u00eb kuptimin marksist-leninist), pra i pavarur nga nd\u00ebrhyrjet e jashtme, t\u00eb cilat mund ta ken\u00eb ngadal\u00ebsuar a shpejtuar k\u00ebt\u00eb proces, po q\u00eb n\u00eb asnj\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb nuk kan\u00eb mundur ta ndalojn\u00eb. S\u00eb dyti, me krijimin e k\u00ebsaj idiome t\u00eb re (shqipja standarde), dialektet i n\u00ebnshtrohen nj\u00eb tkurrjeje po dialektike, sepse vendin e tyre p\u00ebr her\u00eb e m\u00eb shum\u00eb e z\u00eb n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb dialektike gjuha standarde, me t\u00eb cil\u00ebn kryhet komunikimi i p\u00ebrditsh\u00ebm jet\u00ebsor i banor\u00ebve q\u00eb jan\u00eb n\u00eb \u00e7do koh\u00eb n\u00eb kontakt me t\u00eb (shkolla, shtypi, media televizive etj.)
\nKjo histori vazhdoi deri m\u00eb 1991, kur papritmas, nj\u00eb nd\u00ebr ithtar\u00ebt e Kongresit t\u00eb Drejtshkrimit, dr. Xhevat Lloshi, gjat\u00eb polemik\u00ebs me Arshi Pip\u00ebn (n\u00eb artikullin \u201cKultura shqiptare p\u00ebrpara shqet\u00ebsimeve t\u00eb reja\u201d, botuar n\u00eb revist\u00ebn socialiste \u201cSot\u201d) del kund\u00ebr A. Kostallarit, duke mbajtur an\u00ebn e Bajronit.
\nN\u00eb konferenc\u00ebn \u201cGjuha letrare komb\u00ebtare dhe bota shqiptare sot\u201d, mbajtur n\u00eb Tiran\u00eb n\u00eb n\u00ebntor t\u00eb vitit 1992, u pohua haptas se baza dialektore e gjuh\u00ebs letrare shqipe na paska qen\u00eb tosk\u00ebrishtja letrare!
\nTani nuk kishim m\u00eb nj\u00eb p\u00ebrfundim t\u00eb nj\u00eb studiuesi, por t\u00eb nj\u00eb konference nd\u00ebrkomb\u00ebtare. K\u00ebshtu q\u00eb na viheshin p\u00ebrball\u00eb dy p\u00ebrfundime: nj\u00ebri i Kongresit t\u00eb Drejtshkrimit, ku gjuha shqipe letrare komb\u00ebtare e nj\u00ebsuar ishte formuar sui generis dhe q\u00ebndronte mbi dialektet (\u201cmbidialektore\u201d); tjetri i konferenc\u00ebs (edhe kjo nd\u00ebrkomb\u00ebtare; por jo Kongres, q\u00eb t\u00eb arrinte t\u00eb shfuqizonte vendimet e Kongresit t\u00eb Drejtshkrimit), q\u00eb pa asnj\u00eb dridhje qerpiku, nxirrte p\u00ebrfundimin tjet\u00ebr q\u00eb shqipja e nj\u00ebsuar na qenka nd\u00ebrtuar mbi baz\u00ebn e tosk\u00ebrishtes letrare.
\nTani kushdo q\u00eb ka dy fije mend n\u00eb kok\u00eb, detyrimisht do t\u00eb shtronte pyetjen: A duhet ta diskutojm\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb pun\u00eb, apo t\u00eb pranojm\u00eb qorrazi dy p\u00ebrfundime krejt\u00ebsisht t\u00eb kund\u00ebrta p\u00ebr t\u00eb nj\u00ebjtin problem? E, si\u00e7 shkruan R. Ismajli: \u201cPo t\u2019i mbash \u00e7\u00ebshtjet e mbyllura n\u00eb kazan derisa fermentojn\u00eb, ka rrezik q\u00eb ta zb\u00ebrthejn\u00eb fare kazanin\u201d.
\nTani,\u00a0a e dinin gjuh\u00ebtar\u00ebt tan\u00eb t\u00eb nderuar se n\u00eb baz\u00ebn e gjuh\u00ebs letrare t\u00eb nj\u00ebsuar ishte v\u00ebn\u00eb tosk\u00ebrishtja, dhe se \u201csui generis\u201d e \u201cbashk\u00ebveprimi nd\u00ebrdialektor\u201d qen\u00eb vet\u00ebm slogane, p\u00ebr t\u2019u hedhur hi syve njer\u00ebzve?<\/strong><\/p>\n

N\u00eb qoft\u00eb se e dinin, p\u00ebrse nuk fol\u00ebn at\u00ebher\u00eb? N\u00eb qoft\u00eb se nuk e dinin, kur u kujtuan p\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb? K\u00ebt\u00eb duhet t\u00eb na thon\u00eb, sepse ata e kan\u00eb mbrojtur me zjarr k\u00ebt\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb formimi t\u00eb gjuh\u00ebs letrare. Dhe ja \u00e7\u2019na thot\u00eb nj\u00ebri prej tyre, prof. Anastas Dodi.<\/p>\n

Kur nj\u00eb gazetar i \u201cJav\u00ebs\u201d s\u00eb Prishtin\u00ebs e pyet: \u201cPse n\u00eb Kongres nuk u tha q\u00eb baza e gjuh\u00ebs letrare shqipe, q\u00eb po fiksohej aty, \u00ebsht\u00eb dialekti tosk\u00eb?\u201d, prof. Dodi p\u00ebrgjigjet: \u201cM\u00eb kujtohet q\u00eb kjo pun\u00eb u bisedua, dhe ne i b\u00ebm\u00eb v\u00ebrejtje atij referatit t\u00eb Kostallarit, edhe i tham\u00eb se duhet t\u00eb thuhet q\u00eb dialekti baz\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb tosk\u00ebrishtja, q\u00eb vihet n\u00eb baz\u00ebn e gjuh\u00ebs letrare. Por u tha se kjo mund t\u00eb b\u00ebj\u00eb m\u00eb shum\u00eb d\u00ebm sesa t\u00eb sjell\u00eb dobi\u201d.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Tani po A. Dodi, n\u00eb artikullin \u201cDisa probleme t\u00eb gjuh\u00ebs letrare n\u00eb vepr\u00ebn e Enver Hoxh\u00ebs\u201d, ka shkruar: \u201cQ\u00eb m\u00eb 15 qershor 1955, shoku Enver Hoxha me nj\u00eb qart\u00ebsi shum\u00eb t\u00eb madhe thot\u00eb se \u2018gjuha e sotme letrare shqipe nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb tosk\u00ebrishtja\u2026\u2019\u201d Si\u00e7 e shihni na dalin dy Anastas\u00eb, dhe nuk dim\u00eb se cilit t\u2019i z\u00ebm\u00eb bes\u00eb?<\/p>\n

Pse nuk firmosi Rezoluten e Kongresit te Drejtshkrimit \u201972 poeti Lasgush Poradeci?<\/strong>
\nVet\u00ebm nj\u00eb pjes\u00ebmarr\u00ebs i Kongresit t\u00eb Drejtshkrimit nuk ka firmosur Rezolut\u00ebn. Ky ka qen\u00eb poeti Lasgush Poradeci. Kur k\u00ebt\u00eb fakt ia kumtova prof. E. Lafes n\u00eb nj\u00eb tubim n\u00eb Shkod\u00ebr, tek p\u00ebrkujtonim N. Joklin, ai fillimisht e kund\u00ebrshtoi, po pastaj u kujtua dhe m\u00eb tha se Lasgushi u s\u00ebmur sapo mbaroi Kongresi. Ne shkuam n\u00eb spital t\u2019ia merrnim firm\u00ebn, m\u00eb tha ai, por ai nuk ishte mir\u00eb, dhe ne u larguam. Po at\u00eb vit, un\u00eb e takova poetin n\u00eb nj\u00eb shoq\u00ebri konfidenciale dhe e pyeta me shejtanll\u00ebk p\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb mosfirmosje e p\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb s\u00ebmundje, p\u00ebr t\u00eb cil\u00ebn e kisha marr\u00eb vesh se ishte e shpifur dhe e b\u00ebr\u00eb me q\u00ebllim. Autori m\u00eb v\u00ebshtroi gjat\u00eb, pastaj m\u00eb tha: \u201cUn\u00eb e kam frik\u00eb historin\u00eb!\u201d<\/p>\n

Pas gjith\u00eb k\u00ebtij parashtrimi, do t\u00eb d\u00ebshiroja t\u00eb pyesja t\u00eb gjith\u00eb gjuh\u00ebtar\u00ebt tan\u00eb, gjithnj\u00eb t\u00eb dyzuar n\u00eb th\u00ebniet e tyre, a t\u00eb mblidhemi e t\u00eb vendosim t\u00ebr\u00eb s\u00eb bashku se cila \u00ebsht\u00eb baza e shqipes standarde? Se kemi plot 25 vjet q\u00eb nuk po i biem n\u00eb t\u00eb?<\/strong>\u00a0Ta vendosim, pra, nj\u00ebher\u00eb e mir\u00eb e ta mbyllim k\u00ebt\u00eb muhabet. Do t\u00eb mjaftonte, p\u00ebr sa thash\u00eb m\u00eb lart, pyetja me t\u00eb cil\u00ebn nj\u00eb nd\u00ebr personalitetet e gjuh\u00ebsis\u00eb shqiptare, Sh. Demiraj, nis kumtes\u00ebn e vet n\u00eb Konferenc\u00ebn p\u00ebr 30-vjetorin e Kongresit t\u00eb Drejtshkrimit: \u201c\u2026 n\u00ebse vendimi p\u00ebr shqipen e sotme standarde ishte shkenc\u00ebrisht i mb\u00ebshtetur\u201d. Tani, pavar\u00ebsisht nga p\u00ebrgjigjja, p\u00ebr deri sa shtrohet kjo pyetje, do t\u00eb thot\u00eb q\u00eb motivi p\u00ebr ta diskutuar k\u00ebt\u00eb fakt, q\u00ebndron n\u00eb k\u00ebmb\u00eb.
\nNdaj duhet diskutimi. Sepse, ka t\u00eb tjer\u00eb q\u00eb kan\u00eb rrahur mendime t\u00eb kund\u00ebrta p\u00ebr k\u00ebto probleme. B. Beci p.sh. shprehet qart\u00eb: \u201cGjithsesi, konkluzioni i paraqitur nga A. Kostallari se n\u00eb periudh\u00ebn e nd\u00ebrtimit t\u00eb socializmit n\u00eb Shqip\u00ebri boshti themelor rreth t\u00eb cilit \u00ebsht\u00eb zhvilluar gjith\u00eb sistemi i gjuh\u00ebs letrare ka qen\u00eb dhe \u00ebsht\u00eb bashk\u00ebveprimi nd\u00ebrdialektor, nuk del i v\u00ebrtetuar.\u201d
\nPra, p\u00ebr t\u2019i dh\u00ebn\u00eb p\u00ebrgjigje pyetjes: Cila \u00ebsht\u00eb baza dialektore e shqipes standarde?, duhet m\u00eb par\u00eb t\u00eb kalohet n\u00eb sit\u00eb teoria e prof. Kostallarit p\u00ebr formimin e gjuh\u00ebs letrare t\u00eb nj\u00ebsuar. Duhet provuar, pra, jo me pohime, por me studime akademike, se shqipja e sotme standarde \u00ebsht\u00eb nd\u00ebrtuar mbi baz\u00ebn e tosk\u00ebrishtes s\u00eb ngritur n\u00eb standard. Pasi t\u2019i jepet p\u00ebrgjigje k\u00ebsaj pyetjeje, at\u00ebher\u00eb b\u00ebhet krejt e qart\u00eb se baza dialektore e shqipes standarde mund t\u00eb zgjerohet.
\nDeri m\u00eb tani, un\u00eb fola shum\u00eb shkurt p\u00ebr \u201crrug\u00ebn e formimit t\u00eb gjuh\u00ebs letrare komb\u00ebtare shqipe; p\u00ebr historin\u00eb e drejtshkrimit t\u00eb saj\u201d, e cila nuk duhet trajtuar si tabu. Gjithashtu, ata q\u00eb mendojn\u00eb ndryshe nuk duhet t\u00eb etiketohen si \u201cantikomb\u00ebtar\u00eb\u201d. N\u00eb shkenc\u00eb ka vler\u00eb gjithnj\u00eb argumenti. Grek\u00ebt e vjet\u00ebr thoshin se \u201ce v\u00ebrteta del gjithnj\u00eb n\u00ebp\u00ebrmjet diskutimit\u201d. \/MAPO\/<\/p>\n

*Prof. dr. David Luka asht gjuhetar dhe pedagog i Universitetit te Shkodres\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\u00a0Nga Prof.dr. David Luka* Luka: Gjuha Standarde asht Gjuha e Kostallarit dhe Partise marksiste-leniniste! Asht Gjuhe e Dhunshme! Shqipja standarde, e ligj\u00ebruar si e till\u00eb n\u00eb koh\u00ebn e regjimit, nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb e dh\u00ebn\u00eb e natyrshme e vet\u00eb gjuh\u00ebs son\u00eb. Gjuh\u00ebtari David Luka, shkruan se ideologjia marksiste ishte ajo q\u00eb \u00e7oi n\u00eb vendosjen e dhunshme t\u00eb…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":6132,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6131","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-intervista"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/revistakuvendi.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6131","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/revistakuvendi.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/revistakuvendi.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revistakuvendi.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revistakuvendi.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=6131"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/revistakuvendi.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6131\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6133,"href":"https:\/\/revistakuvendi.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6131\/revisions\/6133"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revistakuvendi.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/6132"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/revistakuvendi.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=6131"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revistakuvendi.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=6131"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revistakuvendi.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=6131"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}